xkcd
Campaigns

TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.

Petition: remove women of transsexual / intersex history from the GLAAD Media Reference Guide. [ sign ]
Read: Andrea Rosenfield's call for reform.

Opening Doors to Transsexual Medical Research
TS-Si
is dedicated to the acceptance, medical
treatment, and legal
protection of individuals correcting the misalignment
of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition
into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.
is dedicated to the acceptance, medical
treatment, and legal
protection of individuals correcting the misalignment
of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition
into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.
| When Males Overestimate Female Desire |
|
|
| Living - Relationships | |||
| TS-Si News Service | |||
| Thursday, 29 December 2011 10:00 | |||
Austin, TX, USA. A new study hypothesizes that evolution might favor men who incorrectly read a woman's sexual cues.But males can be very optimistic when it comes to reading a females's interest. How can he know for sure whether she does or she doesn't? Sexual cues are ambiguous and confounding. Most of us and especially men often read them wrong. "There are tons of studies showing that men think women are interested when they're not," says Williams College psychologist Carin Perilloux, who conducted the research with Judith A. Easton and David M. Buss of the University of Texas at Austin. "Ours is the first to systematically examine individual differences." Their findings appear in the journal Psychological Science. The Research Setup The subjects were in their late teens and early twenties (96 male and 103 female) who went through a "speed-meeting" exercise talking for three minutes to each of five potential opposite-sex mates. Before the conversations, participants rated themselves on their own attractiveness and were assessed for the level of their desire for a short-term sexual encounter. After each meeting, the participant rated the prospective partner on several measures, including physical attractiveness and sexual interest in the participant. The model used had the advantage of testing the participants in multiple interactions.Men looking for a quick hookup were more likely to overestimate the women's desire for them. Men who thought they were hot also thought the women were hot for them but men who were actually attractive, by the women's ratings, did not make this mistake. The more attractive the woman was to the man, the more likely he was to overestimate her interest. And women tended to underestimate men's desire. A hopeless mess? Evolutionarily speaking, maybe not, say the psychologists. Over millennia, these errors may in fact have enhanced men's reproductive success. "There are two ways you can make an error as a man," says Perilloux.
The researchers theorize that the kind of guy who went for it, even at the risk of being rebuffed, scored more often and passed on his overperceiving tendency to his genetic heirs. The casual sex seekers "face slightly different adaptive problems," says Perilloux. "They are limited mainly by the number of consenting sex partners so overestimation is even more important." Only the actually attractive men probably had no need for misperception. The research contains some messages for daters of both sexes, says Perilloux:
Again, that may not be as bad as it sounds, Perilloux says "if warning them will prevent heartache later on." CitationThe Misperception of Sexual Interest. Carin Perilloux, Judith A. Easton, David M. Buss. Psychological Science 2011. In press.
Email this
Comments (1)
![]() Write comment
|
|||
| Last Updated on Thursday, 29 December 2011 09:34 |



Austin, TX, USA. A new study hypothesizes that
evolution
The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.
The TS-Si News Service
and the TS-Si Research Service are collaborations of TS-Si officials, staff, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The contents do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si or its owners, participants, partners, or affiliates.