xkcd
Campaigns

TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.

Petition: remove women of transsexual / intersex history from the GLAAD Media Reference Guide. [ sign ]
Read: Andrea Rosenfield's call for reform.

Opening Doors to Transsexual Medical Research
TS-Si
is dedicated to the acceptance, medical
treatment, and legal
protection of individuals correcting the misalignment
of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition
into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.
is dedicated to the acceptance, medical
treatment, and legal
protection of individuals correcting the misalignment
of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition
into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.
| Collaboration Benefits Middle-aged Couples with Memory Tasks |
|
|
| Living - Relationships | |||
| TS-Si News Service | |||
| Tuesday, 30 August 2011 09:00 | |||
Ames, IA, USA. Effective memory is a key ability for independent living in later life, but collaboration that helps middle-aged couples with memory tasks doesn't seem to be as effective for couples older than 70.Psychology researchers found that spouses do rely on each other as external memory aids. However, the extent to which this strategy is effective depends on how reliable the partner's memory is, and that reliability changes with age for most people. Jennifer Margrett of Iowa State University (ISU), the study leader, says that her lab found that overall, collaboration is usually very helpful on a variety of cognitive tasks, but "... it's sort of a mixed bag in this recent study, which focuses on memory tasks. When you think about memory, if I ask you to remember something, you'll get on a roll, think of one thing, and then another thing should come. But if you have a partner who's interrupting you, interjecting, and perhaps leading you down a garden path, that can definitely interfere in memory". So you may have done better on the memory path working alone than you did with a partner. ![]() Jennifer A. Margrett, study leader, is assistant professor in human development and family studies at Iowa State University (ISU). She worked with Celinda Reese-Melancon from Oklahoma State University and Peter G. Rendell from Australian Catholic University (ACU). Their findings appear in the Journal of Psychology (Zeitschrift für Psychologie), part of a special issue on prospective memory. They also presented two posters on their results earlier at the American Psychological Association (APA) conference (Boston, MA, USA)."For our middle-aged couples in this pilot study, they definitely seemed to fill in the [memory] gaps more effectively than our older couples did," she continued. "So we found that two heads weren't necessarily better than one among the older couples." Studying married couples The research was conducted on 14 married couples from central Iowa — three being younger (average age of 35), five being middle-aged (average age of 52) and the other six being older couples (average age of 73). All participants were asked to complete a variety of prospective memory tasks by playing the board game "Virtual Week," which encourages verbal interaction among players about completing real life tasks. For each virtual "day" in the game, participants were asked to perform 10 different prospective memory tasks — four that regularly occur (e.g., taking medication with breakfast), four that were different each day (e.g., purchasing gasoline for the car), and two being time-check tasks that were not based on the activities of the board game (e.g., check lung capacity at two specified times). The researchers video-recorded the spouses playing the game in order to determine whether partners tried to assist each other in completing the task, and the impact that collaboration had on their partner's memory. They found that partners attempted to collaborate on prospective memory tasks, reporting evidence of tutoring, monitoring, encoding and sociability among the couples — four of the most frequent types of collaborative behaviors. "We did look at critical statements and demand statements among the couples, and in this sample, they were very low," Margrett said. "If people expressed any sort of socio-emotional type of statements, it was more encouraging of a partner. But from our better to worst comparison of the dyads, the couples who performed at a higher level were more sociable and encouraging." Extending memory dialogue implications While this study specifically examined married couples, Margrett says the research may be extended to others who collaborate in prospective memory tasks each day. "This study had to do with couples, but you interact with co-workers, adult children and others throughout middle and late life. If someone is living in a long-term care facility, they're interacting with caregivers," she said. "And so the idea is to extrapolate our findings to other dyads to see how can we support people within the context of both normal cognitive aging, as well as non-normative cognitive aging — which includes some memory impairment, and potentially dementia." The research team has submitted a grant proposal to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to replicate the research using a larger sample, with plans to study the couples outside of the lab as they perform real-world tasks. FundingThis pilot study was funded, in part, by grants from a Big 12 Faculty Fellowship Program and the College of Human Sciences at Iowa State University (ISU).
CitationExamining Collaborative Dialogue Among Couples: A Window Into Prospective Memory Processes. Jennifer A. Margrett, Celinda Reese-Melancon, Peter G. Rendell. Journal of Psychology 2011; 219(2): 100-107.
Abstract Prospective memory is a key ability required for independent living and consistent with Einstein and McDaniel (1990), we hypothesized that social partners can serve as useful external memory aids, particularly in middle and late life when these abilities may wane. We employed the Virtual Week (Rendell & Craik, 2000) task in a novel way to investigate the contribution of social partners to the prospective memory process. We examined the collaborative interactions of 11 middle-aged (M = 52.15 years; n = 5) and older (M = 75.24 years; n = 6) married dyads. The dialogue of collaborating partners reflected important PM processes (e.g., encoding, monitoring, tutoring). Age group differences favored middle-aged adults, and preliminary evidence suggested a link between collaborative dialogue and PM performance. Further investigation can determine how social partners can be used strategically to improve prospective memory outcomes.
Email this
Comments (1)
![]() Write comment
|
|||
| Last Updated on Monday, 29 August 2011 22:33 |



Ames, IA, USA. Effective memory is a key ability for independent living in later life, but collaboration that helps middle-aged couples with memory tasks doesn't seem to be as effective for couples older than 70.
The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.
The TS-Si News Service
and the TS-Si Research Service are collaborations of TS-Si officials, staff, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The contents do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si or its owners, participants, partners, or affiliates.