RSS Feed: TS-Si News Service. RSS Feed: TS-Si Research Service. TS-Si Reader Comments. Delicious: TS-Si News Service. Digg: TS-Si News Service.
Pinterest.
StumbleUpon. Facebook: TS-Si News Service.
GooglePlus: TS-Si News Service.
Twitter: Follow TS-Si News Service.
Leave a comment.
xkcd
Campaigns


is dedicated to the acceptance, medical
treatment, and legal
protection of individuals correcting the misalignment
of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition
into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.
Sourcing False Beliefs: Obama and McCain Print E-mail
Nation - Politics
TS-Si News Service   
Tuesday, 07 September 2010 15:00

Sourcing False Beliefs: Obama and McCain

East Lansing, MI, USA. There is something beyond plain old ignorance that motivates many Americans to believe President Obama is a Muslim and John McCain is senile, according to a study of smear campaigns.

A Pew Research Center poll conducted in August 2010 found that 18 percent of Americans believed that Barack Obama is a Muslim — up from 11 percent in March 2009 — even though he is documented as a practicing Christian. The poll was conducted before Obama’s recent comments supporting the right for Muslims to build a mosque near Ground Zero in New York City, so the numbers could be even higher.

The research suggests people are most likely to accept such falsehoods, both consciously and unconsciously, when subtle clues remind them of ways in which a candidate is different from them, whether because of age, race, social class or other ideological differences.

Spee Kosloff

Spee Kosloff
Psychologist
Michigan State University

Spee Kosloff, a psychologist at Michigan State University (MSU), and his colleagues, launched their study prior to the 2008 U.S. presidential election, as the candidates were being bombarded with smear campaigns. It is the first comprehensive experimental study of the psychological factors that motivate Americans to believe the lies. The findings are published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.

The research team says biased judgments are not just irrational; they are fueled by an “irresponsible” media culture that allows political pundits and “talking heads” to perpetuate the lies.

“Careless or biased media outlets are largely responsible for the propagation of these falsehoods, which catch on like wildfire,” said Kosloff, visiting assistant professor of psychology. “And then social differences can motivate acceptance of these lies.”

In four separate experiments (three before the election and one after), the researchers looked at both conscious and unconscious acceptance of political smears by mostly white, non-Muslim college students.

  • For the conscious trials, the participants were shown false blog reports arguing that Obama is a Muslim or a socialist or that John McCain is senile.

  • The unconscious trials involved gauging how rapidly subjects could identify smear-relevant words such as “Muslim” or “turban” after Obama’s name was presented subliminally.

Among the results:

  • On average, participants who supported McCain said there is a 56 percent likelihood Obama is a Muslim. But when they were asked to fill out a demographic card asking for their own race, the likelihood jumped to 77 percent.

    Kosloff said this shows that simply thinking about a social category that differentiated participants from Obama was enough to get them to believe the smear.

  • Participants undecided about the candidates said there is a 43 percent chance McCain is senile — a number that increased to 73 percent when they simply listed their own age on a card.

  • Undecided participants said there is a 25 percent chance Obama is a socialist — a number that jumped to 62 percent when they considered race.

    “Even though being a socialist has nothing to do with race,” Kosloff said, “irrationally they tied the two together.”

Kosloff said the increase in belief that Obama is Muslim likely reflects a growing disenchantment with his presidency — a sense that people feel Obama is not on their side.

“When people are unsatisfied with the president — whether it’s the way he’s handling the economy, health care or Afghanistan — our research suggests that this only fuels their readiness to accept untrue rumors,” Kosloff said.

“As his job rating goes down, suggesting that people feel like he’s not ideologically on their side, we see an increase in this irrational belief that he’s a Muslim,” he added. “Unfortunately, in America, many people dislike Muslims so they’ll label Obama as Muslim when they feel different from him.”

ParticipationThe study was done with researchers from the University of Arizona, the University of British Columbia and Leiden University in the Netherlands.
CitationSmearing the Opposition: Implicit and Explicit Stigmatization of the 2008 U.S. Presidential Candidates and the Current U.S. President. Spee Kosloff, Jeff Greenberg, Toni Schmader, Mark Dechesne, and David Weise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2010; 139(3): 383-398. doi:10.1037/a0018809
Download PDF
Abstract

Four studies investigated whether political allegiance and salience of outgroup membership contribute to the phenomenon of acceptance of false, stigmatizing information (smears) about political candidates. Studies 1–3 were conducted in the month prior to the 2008 U.S. Presidential election and together demonstrated that pre-standing opposition to John McCain or Barack Obama, as well as the situational salience of differentiating social categories (i.e., for Obama, race; for McCain, age), contributed to the implicit activation and explicit endorsement of smearing labels (i.e., Obama is Muslim; McCain is senile). The influence of salient differentiating categories on smear acceptance was particularly pronounced among politically undecided individuals. Study 4 clarified that social category differences heighten smear acceptance, even if the salient category is semantically unrelated to the smearing label, showing that, approximately 1 year after the election, the salience of race amplified belief that Obama is a socialist among undecided people and McCain supporters. Taken together, these findings suggest that, at both implicit and explicit cognitive levels, social category differences and political allegiance contribute to acceptance of smears against political candidates.

Keywords: politics, intergroup bias, categorization, implicit and explicit, smear.

Stateline ReportStateline is a nonpartisan, nonprofit news service of the Pew Center on the States that provides daily reporting and analysis on trends in state policy. TS-Si thanks The Pew Charitable Trusts for its support and cooperation.

Stateline reports are prepared and published by TS-Si.org with permission. Signed articles do not necessarily convey an official position of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates.

TS-Si News Service.The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.


TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.


Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
Last Updated on Tuesday, 07 September 2010 13:20