
TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.

Petition: remove women of transsexual / intersex history from the GLAAD Media Reference Guide. [ sign ]
Read: Andrea Rosenfield's call for reform.

Opening Doors to Transsexual Medical Research
is dedicated to the acceptance, medical
treatment, and legal
protection of individuals correcting the misalignment
of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition
into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.
| Sourcing False Beliefs: Obama and McCain |
|
|
| Nation - Politics | |||
| TS-Si News Service | |||
| Tuesday, 07 September 2010 15:00 | |||
|
East Lansing, MI, USA. There is something beyond plain old ignorance that motivates many Americans to believe President Obama is a Muslim and John McCain is senile, according to a study of smear campaigns. A Pew Research Center poll conducted in August 2010 found that 18 percent of Americans believed that Barack Obama is a Muslim — up from 11 percent in March 2009 — even though he is documented as a practicing Christian. The poll was conducted before Obama’s recent comments supporting the right for Muslims to build a mosque near Ground Zero in New York City, so the numbers could be even higher. The research suggests people are most likely to accept such falsehoods, both consciously and unconsciously, when subtle clues remind them of ways in which a candidate is different from them, whether because of age, race, social class or other ideological differences.
Spee Kosloff, a psychologist at Michigan State University (MSU), and his colleagues, launched their study prior to the 2008 U.S. presidential election, as the candidates were being bombarded with smear campaigns. It is the first comprehensive experimental study of the psychological factors that motivate Americans to believe the lies. The findings are published in the Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. The research team says biased judgments are not just irrational; they are fueled by an “irresponsible” media culture that allows political pundits and “talking heads” to perpetuate the lies. “Careless or biased media outlets are largely responsible for the propagation of these falsehoods, which catch on like wildfire,” said Kosloff, visiting assistant professor of psychology. “And then social differences can motivate acceptance of these lies.” In four separate experiments (three before the election and one after), the researchers looked at both conscious and unconscious acceptance of political smears by mostly white, non-Muslim college students.
Among the results:
Kosloff said the increase in belief that Obama is Muslim likely reflects a growing disenchantment with his presidency — a sense that people feel Obama is not on their side. “When people are unsatisfied with the president — whether it’s the way he’s handling the economy, health care or Afghanistan — our research suggests that this only fuels their readiness to accept untrue rumors,” Kosloff said. “As his job rating goes down, suggesting that people feel like he’s not ideologically on their side, we see an increase in this irrational belief that he’s a Muslim,” he added. “Unfortunately, in America, many people dislike Muslims so they’ll label Obama as Muslim when they feel different from him.” ParticipationThe study was done with researchers from the University of Arizona, the University of British Columbia and Leiden University in the Netherlands.
CitationSmearing the Opposition: Implicit and Explicit Stigmatization of the 2008 U.S. Presidential Candidates and the Current U.S. President. Spee Kosloff, Jeff Greenberg, Toni Schmader, Mark Dechesne, and David Weise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2010; 139(3): 383-398. doi:10.1037/a0018809
Download PDF Abstract Four studies investigated whether political allegiance and salience of outgroup membership contribute to the phenomenon of acceptance of false, stigmatizing information (smears) about political candidates. Studies 1–3 were conducted in the month prior to the 2008 U.S. Presidential election and together demonstrated that pre-standing opposition to John McCain or Barack Obama, as well as the situational salience of differentiating social categories (i.e., for Obama, race; for McCain, age), contributed to the implicit activation and explicit endorsement of smearing labels (i.e., Obama is Muslim; McCain is senile). The influence of salient differentiating categories on smear acceptance was particularly pronounced among politically undecided individuals. Study 4 clarified that social category differences heighten smear acceptance, even if the salient category is semantically unrelated to the smearing label, showing that, approximately 1 year after the election, the salience of race amplified belief that Obama is a socialist among undecided people and McCain supporters. Taken together, these findings suggest that, at both implicit and explicit cognitive levels, social category differences and political allegiance contribute to acceptance of smears against political candidates. Keywords: politics, intergroup bias, categorization, implicit and explicit, smear.
Email this
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
|
|||
| Last Updated on Tuesday, 07 September 2010 13:20 |






The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.
The TS-Si News Service
and the TS-Si Research Service are collaborations of TS-Si officials, staff, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The contents do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si or its owners, participants, partners, or affiliates.