Los Angeles, CA, USA. New research provides objective confirmation that large-scale tragedies do not connect with people emotionally in the same way smaller tragedies do that involve individual people. The researchers found that a scope-severity paradox exists in which judgment of harm tends to be based on emotional reactions, and thus people have a stronger emotional response to singular identifiable victims rather than to an entire crowd of sufferers.

The study was conducted by Loran F. Nordgren of the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University, and Mary-Hunter Morris McDonnell of Harvard Law School.

"We see this time and again on the news, where a missing person is featured as a leading story for months because there is emotional interest wrapped up in that single individual," said Nordgren, assistant professor of management and organizations at the Kellogg School. "But, if you think of current stories such as the Chilean miners or the people affected by the BP oil spill, we find that it's harder to relate to those victims unless you get to know their personal stories. The bottom line is that it's difficult for people to connect when there are many faceless victims."

Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin
(1878–1953)

Stalin served as the first General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union's Central Committee from 1922 until his death in 1953.

He become the leader of the Soviet Union after the death of Vladimir Lenin in 1924, ruling as an absolute dictator.

Stalin implemented famines and purges that killed tens of millions of people. He claimed that a single death was a tragedy, but a million deaths was a statistic (1932).

The paper describing this work appears in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science (SPPS). 

Experimental Results

To test their theory, the researchers conducted a series of three experiments.

1. Fraud. In the first study, Nordgren and Morris asked participants to read a story about a financial advisor who defrauded his clients.

Half the time, the story described how only two or three people were harmed and the other half of the time, dozens of people were harmed. After reading the story, participants were asked to evaluate the severity of the crime and to recommend a punishment for the perpetrator, as well as to describe one of the participants in the case.

As predicted, participants in the small-scope condition judged the fraud case more harshly and recommended a longer jail sentence for the perpetrator.

Also, participants could describe an additional three traits in the small-scope condition over the large-scope condition. The researchers noted that this victim identifiability effect allows people to form more vivid mental representations of a smaller number of victims.

2. Identification. The second experiment tested whether the researchers could correct this bias by manipulating the identifiability of the victims.

The participants read a story about a food processing company that sold tainted food that made people sick.

One group was given a basic description of the victims whereas a second group received a photo of one of the victims along with her name and occupation.

As in the first experiment, stronger identifiability with the victim led participants to perceive the crime more severely and to recommend greater punishment for the company.

To take this experiment one step further, the second experiment also explored whether participants would act more ethically if they identified more strongly with the victims in the food tainting story. They were asked to imagine that they worked for the company, and if they would blow the whistle on their employer.

Consistent with previous results, the participants were less inclined to blow the whistle when more victims were involved, suggesting that making the victim more vivid can partially overcome the scope-severity paradox.

3. Justice. The third experiment examined scope-severity in real jury verdicts.

The researchers looked at the outcomes of 133 U.S. court cases between 2000 and 2009 in which someone had been negligently exposed to either asbestos, lead paint or toxic mold.

They found that total damages decreased as the number of people affected increased.

Perceived Severity

"In all three studies, we found that increasing the number of people victimized by a crime actually decreases the perceived severity of that crime and leads people to recommend less punishment for crimes that victimize more people," said Nordgren.

According to Nordgren, the paradox is problematic especially in situations involving mass crimes like genocide in which harm is extreme and widely dispersed among a large population of people. But, he noted that vivid, personalized accounts of individual victims, such as the Diary of Anne Frank, can help people grasp the severity of mass crimes.

"To combat this paradox, individuating victims partially helps the problem," he said. "When there is specific information about one or two victims out of a larger group, there is more sympathy than when there isn't specific information about anyone."

The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.


TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.

Tweet

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Show/hide comments

Show/hide comment form

Name

Email

Website

Title

Comment

smaller | bigger

I have read and agree to the Terms of Usage.

Add Comment