
TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.

Petition: remove women of transsexual / intersex history from the GLAAD Media Reference Guide. [ sign ]
Read: Andrea Rosenfield's call for reform.

Opening Doors to Transsexual Medical Research
is dedicated to the acceptance, medical
treatment, and legal
protection of individuals correcting the misalignment
of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition
into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.
| Genetic Network For Sexual Reproduction Shows Selective Adaptation |
|
|
| SciMed - Genetics & Genome | |||
| TS-Si News Service | |||
| Monday, 20 September 2010 15:00 | |||
|
Irvine, CA, USA. Molly Burke shows that where sex is involved, evidence of A team at the University of California, Irvine (UCI) deciphered how fruit flies, bred to rapidly develop and reproduce, actually evolve over time. Most people don’t think of flies as close relatives, but previous research established that humans and other mammals share 70 percent of the same genes as the tiny, banana-eating insect known as Drosophila melanogaster. The findings, reported in the journal Nature, contradict the long-held belief that sexual beings evolve the same way simpler organisms do and could fundamentally alter the direction of genetic research. “This research really upends the dominant paradigm about how species evolve,” said ecology and evolutionary biology professor Anthony Long, the primary investigator. For decades, most researchers have assumed that sexual species evolve the same way single-cell bacteria do: A genetic mutation sweeps through a population and quickly becomes “fixated” on a particular portion of DNA. But the UCI work shows that when sex is involved, it is far more complicated than generally accepted.
Lead author and doctoral student Molly Burke (cf. lead image) compared super flies, originally bred in the Michael Rose laboratory, to a control group on a genome-wide basis, the first time such a study of a sexually reproducing species has been done. The work married DNA “soup” gathered from the adapted flies with cheap, efficient technology that uses cutting-edge informatics tools to analyze the DNA of entire organisms. “It’s really exciting,” she said. “This is a new way of identifying genes that are important for traits we’re interested in — as opposed to the old hunting and pecking, looking at one gene at a time.” Based on that old and flawed paradigm, Rose noted, treatment schemes have been knowledge-limited, including some medications for general treatment and those for specific diseases, with serious side effects. He said those side effects probably occur because researchers were targeting single genes, rather than the hundreds of possible gene groups like those Burke found in the flies. Scientists who did not participate in the work agreed that it could change the direction of such research. “Anyone who expects to find a single solution for problems like aging will be disappointed, because this work suggests there’s no one genetic target that could be fixed,” said Richard Lenski, an evolutionary biologist at Michigan State University (MSU). “On the other hand, it means there are many genetic factors that can be further investigated.” FundingThe study was funded by grants from the University of California, Irvine (UCI) and the National Science Foundation (NSF) grants.
ParticipationKevin Thornton and Parvin Shahrestani of the University of California, Irvine (UCI) and Joseph Dunham of the University of Southern California (USC) are co-authors of the study.
Citation Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila. Molly K. Burke, Joseph P. Dunham, Parvin Shahrestani, Kevin R. Thornton, Michael R. Rose and Anthony D. Long. Nature 2010; ePub ahead of print. doi:10.1038/nature09352
Abstract Experimental evolution systems allow the genomic study of adaptation, and so far this has been done primarily in asexual systems with small genomes, such as bacteria and yeast. Here we present whole-genome resequencing data from Drosophila melanogaster populations that have experienced over 600 generations of laboratory selection for accelerated development. Flies in these selected populations develop from egg to adult ~20% faster than flies of ancestral control populations, and have evolved a number of other correlated phenotypes. On the basis of 688,520 intermediate-frequency, high-quality single nucleotide polymorphisms, we identify several dozen genomic regions that show strong allele frequency differentiation between a pooled sample of five replicate populations selected for accelerated development and pooled controls. On the basis of resequencing data from a single replicate population with accelerated development, as well as single nucleotide polymorphism data from individual flies from each replicate population, we infer little allele frequency differentiation between replicate populations within a selection treatment. Signatures of selection are qualitatively different than what has been observed in asexual species; in our sexual populations, adaptation is not associated with ‘classic’ sweeps whereby newly arising, unconditionally advantageous mutations become fixed. More parsimonious explanations include ‘incomplete’ sweep models, in which mutations have not had enough time to fix, and ‘soft’ sweep models, in which selection acts on pre-existing, common genetic variants. We conclude that, at least for life history characters such as development time, unconditionally advantageous alleles rarely arise, are associated with small net fitness gains or cannot fix because selection coefficients change over time.
Email this
Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
|
|||
| Last Updated on Monday, 20 September 2010 08:51 |




evolution

The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. Sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates. We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.
The TS-Si News Service
and the TS-Si Research Service are collaborations of TS-Si officials, staff, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The contents do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si or its owners, participants, partners, or affiliates.