Does Electronic Access To Research Publications Restrain Scientific Diversity?

Campaigns

Please donate to the Maetreum of Cybele.

The Maetreum of Cybele needs your help in their fight for religious freedom.

The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA, H.R. 3261) and the Protect IP Act (PIPA, S. 968) would devastate the online economy and overall web freedom, including sites with user generated content.

For information, visit the SOPA Blackout site and read An open letter to Washington from tech industry leaders.

Petition: remove women of transsexual / intersex history from the GLAAD Media Reference Guide. [ sign ]
Read: Andrea Rosenfield's call for reform.

Opening Doors to Transsexual Medical Research

TS-Si supports open access to publicly funded research.

TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.

xkcd

Wrong Superhero

Baby Names

TS-Si

is dedicated to the acceptance, medical
treatment, and legal
protection of individuals correcting the misalignment
of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition
into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.

Does Electronic Access To Research Publications Restrain Scientific Diversity?

SciMed - Horizons

TS-Si News Service

Sunday, 20 July 2008 17:00

Does Electronic Access To Research Publications Restrain Diversity?

TS-Si Science Enterprise

Some Editors Coerce Citations From Their Own Journals

Huntsville, AL, USA. Some of the editors at professional journals coerce authors into adding unnecessary citations to articles in the same journal that is considering publishing the submitted work. The effect is to frequency...

Manchester, United Kingdom. Discovering that graphene is superpermeable with respect to water, scientists now have a material that directly addresses the design of filtration, separation or barrier membranes — and for th...

Arlington, VA, USA. States reduced per-student funding for major public research universities by a fifth during the past decade, according to a new report from the National Science Board (NSB). Meantime, foreign competitors ...

Language Ambiguity Seen As Advantage

Cambridge, MA, USA. Cognitive scientists at MIT have developed a new take on why human language has so many words with multiple meanings, claiming that ambiguity actually makes language more efficient. By allowing for the re...

Vienna, Austria. While the Heisenberg uncertainty principle has proven valid since it was published in 1927, new results published in the journal Nature Physics suggest the basic arguments have to be revisited. The principle...

Houston, TX, USA. Using common carbon fiber, scientists have discovered a one-step chemical process that is markedly simpler than established techniques for making graphene quantum dots, tiny specks of matter with properties ...

Chicago, IL, USA. Scientists and scholars must document their sources in professional publications, but can there be an objective standard for their number and diversity? A sociologist implies as much by analyzing how rapid access to increasing numbers of academic journals has narrowed citations to fewer and more recent papers.

James Evans is an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Chicago, who focuses on the nature of scholarly research. He argues in Science that electronic access, in particular, has restrained diversity, limiting the creation of new ideas and theories.

Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship. James A. Evans. Science 2008 321(5887) 395-399. doi: 10.1126 / science.1150473.

This line of questioning began for Evans during a lecture on the influence of private industry money on research. A student instead asked how the growth of the Internet has shaped science. "I didn't have an immediate answer," Evans says. Evans says "That's where this idea came from. I wanted to know how electronic provision changed science, not how much better it made it."

James Evans is an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Chicago, who focuses on the nature of scholarly research.

When Evans reviewed sientific research on the Internet, he discovered that most of it focused on how much faster and broader scholars could search for information, but not how the medium itself was impacting their work. He analyzed a database of over 34 million articles and compared their online availability from 1998 to 2005 against the number of times they were cited from 1945 to 2005.

As more journal issues came online, the articles cited were fewer in number and more recent. Scholars also seemed to concentrate their citations more on specific journals and articles.

"More is available," Evans said, "but less is sampled, and what is sampled is more recent and located in the most prominent journals."

Evans's research also found that this trend was not evenly distributed across academic disciplines.

Scientists and scholars in the life sciences showed the greatest propensity for referencing fewer articles.
The trend is less noticeable in business and legal scholarship.
Social scientists and scholars in the humanities are more likely to cite newer works than other disciplines.

So what is it about doing research online versus in a bricks-and-mortar library that changes the literature review so critical to research? Evans has identified a few possible explanations.

Studies into how research is conducted show that people browse and peruse material in a library, but they tend to search for articles online.
Online searches tend to organize results by date and relevance, which leads scholars and scientists to pick recent research from the most high profile journals.

Some search tools like Google factor the frequency with which other users select an item during similar searchers to determine relevance.
Online, researchers are also more likely to follow hyper-linked references and links to similar work within an online archive.

Because of this, as more scholars choose to read and reference a given article, future researchers more quickly follow.

Evans doesn't think this phenomenon will spell the end of the literature review. The more important implication for Evans is that it makes scholars and scientists more likely to come to a consensus. This, in turn, can establish a conventional wisdom on a given topic faster than ever before.

"Online access facilitates a convergence on what science is picked up and built upon in subsequent research." The danger in this, he believes, is that if new productive ideas and theories aren't picked up quickly by the research community, they may fade before their useful impact is evaluated. "It's like new movies. If movies don't get watched the first weekend, they're dropped silently," Evans said.

Evans plans to work with linguists and computer scientists to explore how ideas are expressed in articles to better understand what the consequences of losing old ideas are and how they can be retrieved and resurrected, a challenge he sees as being important in the pursuit of knowledge. "With science and scholarship increasing online, findings and ideas that don't receive attention very soon will be forgotten more quickly than ever before."

This research was funded in part by the US National Science Foundation (NSF).

Electronic Publication and the Narrowing of Science and Scholarship. James A. Evans. Science 2008 321(5887) 395-399. doi: 10.1126 / science.1150473.

Abstract

Online journals promise to serve more information to more dispersed audiences and are more efficiently searched and recalled. But because they are used differently than print—scientists and scholars tend to search electronically and follow hyperlinks rather than browse or peruse — electronically available journals may portend an ironic change for science. Using a database of 34 million articles, their citations (1945 to 2005), and online availability (1998 to 2005), I show that as more journal issues came online, the articles referenced tended to be more recent, fewer journals and articles were cited, and more of those citations were to fewer journals and articles. The forced browsing of print archives may have stretched scientists and scholars to anchor findings deeply into past and present scholarship. Searching online is more efficient and following hyperlinks quickly puts researchers in touch with prevailing opinion, but this may accelerate consensus and narrow the range of findings and ideas built upon.

The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates.

We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.

TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.

Email this

Comments (2) Add Comment

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Show/hide comments

Are Online and Free Online Access Broadening or Narrowin

05 August 2008

TS-Si and Open Access, Hi Stevan, thank you for dropping

05 August 2008

Hi Stevan, thank you for dropping by. TS-Si certainly supports the movement out of principle and self-interest.

There are many reasons to support Open Access. However, some recent research out of Cornell suggests there is no citation advantage in Open Access. Their main point is that open access articles are read more, but the rate of citation is about the same. They suggest that as more journals open up, the rate at which they are cited remains steady.

This supports your point: the researchers read more but become more selective (in relative terms).

We plan to have more in-depth coverage of this research in tomorrow night's edition. In the meantime, here is the reference:

Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial. Philip M Davis, Bruce V Lewenstein, Daniel H Simon, James G Booth, Mathew J L Connolly. British Medical Journal ePub ahead of print 31 July 2008. 2008;337:a568, doi: 10.1136/bmj.a568

Abstract

Objective. To measure the effect of free access to the scientific literature on article downloads and citations.

Design. Randomised controlled trial.

Setting. 11 journals published by the American Physiological Society.

Participants. 1619 research articles and reviews.

Main outcome measures. Article readership (measured as downloads of full text, PDFs, and abstracts) and number of unique visitors (internet protocol addresses). Citations to articles were gathered from the Institute for Scientific Information after one year.

Interventions. Random assignment on online publication of articles published in 11 scientific journals to open access (treatment) or subscription access (control).

Results. Articles assigned to open access were associated with 89% more full text downloads (95% confidence interval 76% to 103%), 42% more PDF downloads (32% to 52%), and 23% more unique visitors (16% to 30%), but 24% fewer abstract downloads (?29% to ?19%) than subscription access articles in the first six months after publication. Open access articles were no more likely to be cited than subscription access articles in the first year after publication. Fifty nine per cent of open access articles (146 of 247) were cited nine to 12 months after publication compared with 63% (859 of 1372) of subscription access articles. Logistic and negative binomial regression analysis of article citation counts confirmed no citation advantage for open access articles.

Conclusions. Open access publishing may reach more readers than subscription access publishing. No evidence was found of a citation advantage for open access articles in the first year after publication. The citation advantage from open access reported widely in the literature may be an artefact of other causes.

Sharon S. Gaughan

Write comment

Show/hide comment form

< Prev		Next >

Last Updated on Sunday, 20 July 2008 17:39

TS-Siis dedicated to the acceptance, legal protection, and medical treatment of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.

We welcome responsible comments. Use the public article forms throughout this site or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission.

The TS-Si News Service and the TS-Si Research Service are collaborations of TS-Si officials, staff, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The contents do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si or its owners, participants, partners, or affiliates.

Except as explicitly noted in specific cases, works on this TS-Si.org website are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. Copyright © 2005-2011 TS-Si, Inc. Some rights reserved.