Campaigns
The Maetreum of Cybele needs your help in their fight for religious freedom.
The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA, H.R. 3261) and the Protect IP Act (PIPA, S. 968) would devastate the online economy and overall web freedom, including sites with user generated content.
For information, visit the SOPA Blackout site and read An open letter to Washington from tech industry leaders.
Petition: remove women of transsexual / intersex history from the GLAAD Media Reference Guide. [ sign ]
Read: Andrea Rosenfield's call for reform.
Opening Doors to Transsexual Medical Research
TS-Si supports open and immediate access to publicly funded research.
xkcd
TS-Si
is dedicated to the acceptance, medical
treatment, and legal
protection of individuals correcting the misalignment
of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition
into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.
is dedicated to the acceptance, medical
treatment, and legal
protection of individuals correcting the misalignment
of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition
into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens.
| Bureaucracy 101: Restructures, Reviews, Re-organisation |
 |
 |
| Opinion - Guest Columns | |||
| George Fripley | |||
| Tuesday, 15 July 2008 17:00 | |||
 Perth, Western Australia, AUS. When in government, there is likely to come a time when you have honed your bureaucratic skills to such a point that you have achieved promotion to a reasonably senior level in your department. It is at this point that you will be in a position to implement advanced procrastination methods.Now that you are in charge of large numbers of people, you will find yourself responsible for human resource issues, business planning, staff accommodation, and many more important administrative matters. All of these areas significantly broaden your influence and increase your ability to cause obstruction to progress.
The Operational Review
Whenever a branch, or even department, appears to be on the verge of achieving decision-making status, be this because an overzealous manager believes this is the purpose of the branch, or that procrastination options have been exhausted, the correct step is to order a review of the branch in question to investigate whether it is delivering the appropriate level of service.
This review will take up considerable time and distract the senior branch officers by requiring them to sit down and write tedious explanations and justifications of their activities.
An external consultant is often brought in to carry out the review. This consultant is unlikely to have any knowledge of the actual activities of the branch or the areas within which staff work, causing a great deal of time to be expended with repetitive explanations.
Their lack of knowledge is likely to lead to an extended review period and a good chance that their conclusions and recommendations will be totally inappropriate.
A bonus associated with the review process, and the lengthy period of time that it takes, is that staff within the branch are distracted and find concentrating on their work difficult because of the all the uncertainty that a review brings.
Added to this, rumours and stories are bound to start circulating about the likely outcomes of the review (often based on other rumours), which will further reduce productivity and stall decision-making processes.
A review is a grand opportunity to defer all decision-making until the outcome is known. As every department is reviewed on a semi-regular basis, it is almost guaranteed that one in every three years will be taken up with such a review and its consequences.
The Restructure
Once a review has been completed, one of the usual recommendations is that a restructure of the branch or department is required to accommodate the suggested changes.
This restructure will need to be carefully considered, as there will be robust debate about where different responsibilities should reside. The review will suggest one thing, while the staff actually involved with the relevant areas will, in all probability, have a different perspective based on practical and sensible considerations. These poor souls would be the ruin of the public service if they were allowed to get their way.
The possibility of a restructure will cause as much angst as the review process. Section Managers will all be jostling to ensure that they don’t lose staff members (whoever manages the most people wins!) or worse still, lose responsibilities.
Junior staff members will worry about who they will be working for and what they will be doing.
The ultimate aim of the restructure is to reposition people into areas that they know little about, to ensure that they broaden their knowledge. Of course this also means that much time is needed familiarise themselves with the new area and overcome the uncertainty that results from knowing they need to make decisions on things that they know nothing about. Decision-making is thus slowed down considerably.
Office Re-organisation
Following the review and restructure, there will be a need to re-organise the office layout and dynamics. This will further disrupt the branch and cause arguments about who sits next to who and who gets the window seats, and so on. This can go on for years, and be the cause of long-held grudges.
New Procedures
A restructure often means that new administrative procedures need to be developed. This has the potential to cause confusion and delays to process-based operations. A good administrative process will involve as many steps as possible and have timelines that are not achievable.
This presents yet another opportunity to employ a consultant to review and/or redesign the process. This will take a very long time and be the cause of many arguments between the consultant and the people who will need to make the process work. As with many consultancies, it has the potential to spawn a number of further consultant contracts, ensuring that someone, somewhere, gets to spend their budget by the end of the financial year.
Business Planning
Of course, once all the reviews and restructures have taken place, they need to be incorporated into the next year’s Business Plan.
This is a golden opportunity for the senior bureaucrat to delay decision-making, cause untold stress to their employees, as well as cause havoc among stakeholders who have just got their head around the previous direction of the department or branch.
Changing the requirements of the business plan from one year to the next will not only be fun, but you can then sit back and watch the chaos unfold. Changing the format, the headings, the length of justifications required, and the time frames in which the planning must be completed, can foster such indecision and distraction from the core business of the organisation, that months can be spent unproductively arguing over the new format and whether it provides a good basis from which to work.
Stakeholders will have gnawed most of their fingernails away, waiting for confirmation that projects will continue or that support will still be given, by the time their project or funding application is approved.
Where a Board is involved in the business planning, this adds an extra layer of complexity to the process and has the potential to delay the process to such an extent that the business plan may not be approved until six months into the year for which it has been written!
Notes[N1] George Fripley has worked in the public service for more than eight years, and in that time has risen to the dizzying heights of managing an agency (for a brief period of time). He has a great deal of experience in dealing with the day-to-day decision-making processes and has a wealth of knowledge about government process. He is currently in hiding among the stacks of files in his government department, hoping that his revelations do not cause him to become the subject of an ASIO investigation, [N2] or worse still, that somebody realises that he actually exists and sends some work his way!
[N2] Editor's note. Mister Fripley referred to ASIO, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO). It is Australia's national security service. ASIO has the job of gathering information and produce intelligence that will enable it to warn the government about activities or situations that might endanger Australia's national security. Um, that doesn't mean George, of course.  The TS-Si News Service is a collaborative effort by TS-Si.org editors, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The sources can include the cited individuals and organizations, as well as TS-Si.org staff contributions. Articles and news reports do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si, its partners, or affiliates.We welcome your comments. Use the form below to leave a public comment or send private correspondence via the TS-Si Contact Page. We will not divulge any personal details or place you on a mailing list without your permission. TS-Si is dedicated to the acceptance, medical treatment, and legal protection of individuals correcting the misalignment of their brains and their anatomical sex, while supporting their transition into society as hormonally reconstituted and surgically corrected citizens. 
 
Tweet
Email this
Comments (1)
 Write comment
|
|||
| Last Updated on Thursday, 06 November 2008 20:30 |
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Show/hide comments
Show/hide comment form
The TS-Si News Service
and the TS-Si Research Service are collaborations of TS-Si officials, staff, contributors, and corresponding institutions. The contents do not necessarily convey official positions of TS-Si or its owners, participants, partners, or affiliates.